McAdams v. Ellington
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This case involves B.J. McAdams’s claims against four separate parties: 1) Alma Lee McAdams, 2) Loyd Stanley and Stanley Jewelers Gemologist (“Stanleys”), 3) Keith Mittledorf, and 4) Melvin Ellington. All of the claims arise from property ownership disputes and other matters that have been the subjects of marital litigation between Mr. McAdams and Alma Lee McAdams. The Chancellor found that Mr. McAdams had no rights in the items at issue. We affirm the Chancellor’s decision with respect to the claims against the Stanleys, but we must reverse as to the claims against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berry v. Saline Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Scollard v. ScollardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Nance v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- DePriest v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Thiel v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Forrester v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Beadles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.