Brown v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
After a trial by jury, the appellant William Brown, Jr. was convicted of grand larceny of an automobile under T. 11 § 631. From the sentence imposed he has appealed. He alleges three errors in the charge to the jury: (1) refusal of the trial Judge to charge on the circumstantial evidence rule; (2) refusal to charge that a permissible verdict was guilty of operating a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner; (3) misleading language concerning the presumption arising from possession of recently stolen property.
Thomas A. Ciconte works in a barber shop in Wilmington Manor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- State v. FitzsimonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
- State v. Von BurenNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Derrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.