Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 8, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice.

After a trial by jury, the appellant William Brown, Jr. was convicted of grand larceny of an automobile under T. 11 § 631. From the sentence imposed he has appealed. He alleges three errors in the charge to the jury: (1) refusal of the trial Judge to charge on the circumstantial evidence rule; (2) refusal to charge that a permissible verdict was guilty of operating a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner; (3) misleading language concerning the presumption arising from possession of recently stolen property.

Thomas A. Ciconte works in a barber shop in Wilmington Manor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. State v. FitzsimonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
  4. State v. Von BurenNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Derrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API