Legal Opinion
State v. Wicker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 2, 2001No. 46002-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Appellant argues that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel because her attorney’s untimely filing of a notice for revision deprived her of her right to seek revision of the commissioner’s ruling finding her guilty of fourth degree assault. Because she was denied the effective assistance of counsel, we reverse her conviction and remand to the Superior court for a revision hearing.
FACTS
After a hearing before a commissioner, Tara Wicker was found guilty of fourth degree assault. On December 1,1999, she received a standard range disposition. At the disposition hearing, Tara…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wallace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Jenkins v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA CENTERSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.