Legal Opinion
Wilson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 29, 1992No. 90-4046CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This case involves plaintiffs claim against the government for back pay allegedly owed him as a result of the Air Force’s failure to promote. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment based upon its assertions that this court does not have jurisdiction and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. After careful examination of the legal issues before it and after hearing oral argument, the court must grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.
FACTS
This is a military pay case. Plaintiff brought this action against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Kenneth L. Wronke v. John A. Marsh, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Bond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Mercer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Cadigan, Magor v. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.