Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2002No. Nos. 70331-1; 70442-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

— We decide whether, in each of these consolidated cases, the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty because he entered it in exchange for a promise from the prosecutor to recommend a particular sentence to the sentencing judge. At the sentencing hearing, a person other than the prosecutor recommended a longer sentence than had been agreed to in the plea agreement. We hold that since neither of these people, Sanchez’s investigating officer (IO) nor Harris’s community corrections officer (CCO), was a party to the plea agreement, no breach of the plea agreement occurred.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. Carreno-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API