Legal Opinion

State v. McKee

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1930No. 29,087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant was convicted of stealing a hog, and appeals.

*2641. The defendant complains of an amendment of the information, which, from the judgment, appears to have been made before arraignment and plea. The information, as first filed, charged that the defendant stole a hog, but did not name its owner. The amendment to the information was that after the word “hog” in the information the following words were inserted, “the property of H. A. Murray.”

Section 62-808 of the Revised Statutes reads:

“An information may be amended in matter of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Omnium Investment Co. v. North American Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Bassett v. GlassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. State v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. State v. ZakouraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API