Legal Opinion

Veverka v. Frank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1913No. 3288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward D. Oldfield, Judge. Action by Max Frank and others, doing business as the Michigan Leather Company, against V. Veverka. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action commenced in the superior court of Oklahoma county by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error on an account for merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered. By agreement of the parties the case was referred to a referee for trial, to take testimony and return findings of fact and conclusions of law. The report of the referee was filed in the trial court on the 26th day of May, 1911. Both plaintiffs and defendant moved the court for judgment on the findings of fact made by the referee. The motion of the plaintiffs (the defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Cowart v. Parker-Washington Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Whitaker v. ChestnutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Orr v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Phillips v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Canadian River R. Co. v. Wichita Falls N.W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API