Legal Opinion

Houston Stanwood & Gamble Co. v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 31, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (C. L. & E. Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller —

Affirming.

By this appeal The Houston Stanwood & Gamble Company asks the reversal of a judgment obtained against it by the appellee Schneider for $1,000;00 damages for personal injuries. Schneider was employed as a boiler maker by the appellant in its shops at Covington, as a handy man between a general laborer and a skilled journeyman. In manufacturing boilers appellant required large sheets of iron, which composed the sections of a boiler, and known as “belly sheets,” to be carried from one portion of the shop- to another, where the boiler was under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  2. Mercer v. Mercer's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Long's Admr. v. Illinois Central R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Johnson v. StiversCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  5. Pullman Co. v. GellerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Home Insurance v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Hudson Engineering Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Bordes v. LeeceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Fuson v. New Bell Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API