Auten v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Appellants-defendants Harry Auten, Martha McFall and Barbara Winchester ap*217peal their convictions of professional gambling, a class D felony.
We affirm the convictions of Auten and McFall, and reverse that of Winchester.
After investigating the Midway Reecreation Center, police arrested the owners and several of the employees, including the defendants herein. Each was charged with one count of professional gambling. Police had observed Auten selling bingo cards and McFall selling tip cards. The police could not recall Winchester's activities, but she had given a statement…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Mahla v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- George v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Auten v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- George v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010