Legal Opinion
Auten v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 1989No. 35A02-8807-CR-286Published
1Opinion of the Court
542 N.E.2d 215 (1989)
Harry G. AUTEN, Martha E. McFall, Barbara L. Winchester, Appellants (Defendants below),
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
No. 35A02-8807-CR-286.[1]
Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.
August 8, 1989.
Bruce M. Frey, Guerrero, Guerrero & Guerrero, Marion, Ind., for appellants.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Gary Damon Secrest, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Appellants-defendants Harry Auten, Martha McFall and Barbara Winchester appeal their convictions of professional gambling, a class D felony.
We affirm the convictions of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Mahla v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- FAIRCHILD, PROSECUTING ATTY., ETC. v. SchankeIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.