Legal Opinion

Price v. United States Baking Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1902No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

■Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Alice L. Price against the United States Baking Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages for injuries received by her while in the employ *501of the defendant. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The important question is, Should the judge have allowed the jury to pass upon the case? The plaintiff was injured in October, 1897. She was then 27 years old. The defendant was engaged in the manufacture of crackers, biscuits, and cakes. The plaintiff testified:

“ That October 14, 1897, she was employed by defendant in the icing room in its factory, situated on Wood-bridge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Schroeder v. Michigan Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lamotte v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hayball v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Juchatz v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neifert v. MetlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API