Legal Opinion

Subodh Naik and Hema Naik v. Suhas Naik

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 23, 2014No. 05-12-01547-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

Subodh Naik (Subodh) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Suhas Naik (Suhas) in this suit to recover the balance due on a note. In four issues, Subodh contends the trial court erred by (1) entering judgment against him personally based on a nonrecourse note, (2) finding the parties agreed to modify the note to remove the restriction regarding personal liability, (8) entering judgment based on a claim that had been released, and (4) denying his request for attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

Subodh and his nephews, Suhas…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wendolyn Messner, as Dependent Administrator v. Mark L. Boon, and Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  2. Courtney Construction, Inc. v. Blue Racer Midstream, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022
  3. Headington Royalty, Inc. and Headington Energy Partners, LLC v. Finley Resources, Inc., Finley Production Co. L.P. and Petro Canyon Energy, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  4. Kevin Geheb v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2017
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rickie Sims, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API