Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ruiz

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 17, 2008No. 06-P-488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Two probationary conditions in the order of the sentencing judge directed that the defendant was to have no contact with the victim, his former domestic partner. However, it is argued in this appeal that, because the three-year probation period was to flow from and after the defendant’s five and one-half year term of imprisonment for his rape of the victim, revocation of probation because of a violation of the no contact probationary orders could not be predicated upon the defendant’s acts while he was serving his prison term precedent to the ensuing probationary term. In essence, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. A.L. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Rubera v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. FaulknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API