Legal Opinion

Ryan v. City of Bay Minette

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1995No. 1940396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Michael Ryan, Katherine Ryan, A.C. McDonald, Pauline Stuart, and Laverne Garner, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendants, the Trotman Company, Inc. ("Trotman"), and the City of Bay Minette, in this action to enjoin a commercial real estate development alleged to be in violation of a city zoning ordinance. We reverse and remand.

The plaintiffs own residential property on Seventh Street in the City of Bay Minette ("the city"). Trotman has obtained the city's approval to construct a shopping center across the street from the plaintiff's property.1 There is no dispute…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Boulder Corp. v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Kirksey v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Homewood Citizens Ass'n v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City of Fairhope & Bd. of AdjustmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Hamilton v. City of FairhopeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Providence Park, Inc. v. Mobile City Planning CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ryan v. City of Bay MinetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API