Legal Opinion

Liebig v. Kirchoff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2014No. 26840, 26841, 26893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Shane Liebig sued Edward Kir-choff for specific performance of an alleged oral contract to purchase real property owned by Kirchoff. Liebig also sued for fraud and deceit. Kirchoff counterclaimed for “unjust enriehment/quantum meruit” arising out of Liebig’s use of the property. After a bench trial, the circuit court denied Liebig’s claim for enforcement of the alleged contract. A jury determined the remaining claims. The jury awarded Lie-big compensatory and punitive damages on his fraud-and-deceit claim. The jury awarded Kirchoff damages on his “unjust…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Wyman v. BrucknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. J. Clancy, Inc. v. Khan Comfort, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Paweltzki v. PaweltzkiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Olson v. BerggrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API