Legal Opinion

H. H. Elder & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1948No. C. D. 1084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This case is before us for decision on a motion to dismiss made by Government counsel. The grounds for the motion are (a) “that this is a protest against the liquidation and not having been made within 60 days after said liquidation, is invalid and untimely within the purview of section 514,” Tariff Act of 1930; (b) “that no demand — -no proper demand had been previously made for reliquidation and that therefore, there has been no official refusal to reliquidate”; and (c) “that no clerical error is shown by the protest or the proof.”

The merchandise involved consists of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  3. Fujimoto & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Import Export Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Gerry Schmitt & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Elder v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API