Todd v. Rustad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Traverse county, C. L. Brown, J., presiding, dissolving an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
Upon the complaint and affidavit of the plaintiff in this action, an injunction was issued restraining the defendants, county officers of the county of Traverse, from removing the offices, records, and other property of the county from Brown’s Val*501ley, heretofore the county-seat of that county, to Wheaton, in the same county. It is alleged in the complaint that proceedings for the removal of the county-seat to Wheaton had been taken under Laws 1889, c. 174, and that, after petition and vote of the electors upon the question, the county commissioners of the county were about to declare the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- State ex rel. Currie v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State ex rel. Gale v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Little v. LanglieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Rickey v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Shaw v. Circuit Court of Hamlin CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.