Legal Opinion
United States v. Pennell
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 26, 1956No. Crim. 11616PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBEET, District Judge.
Defendant is charged by an indictment with the interstate communication of a threat to injure another in violation of Title 18 United States Code, § 875(c). 1
The charging portion of the Indictment: reads as follows:
“ * * * the defendant herein, did knowingly, wilfully, and unlawfully transmit and cause to be transmitted in interstate commerce from Tuscon, Arizona, to the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, in the Northern Division of the Northern District of California, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, a communication, to-wit: a letter addressed to Mrs.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The United States of America v. John Joseph Prochaska, JrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- In Re ShearDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- United States v. James HellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James Edward DutschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. William George LevisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. HazardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.