Legal Opinion
Goolsby v. Pucci Distributing Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1969No. 247PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The original judgment recites: “That the probable duration of Plaintiff’s total disability is six months from date.” Workmen’s compensation was awarded for these six months. Medical benefits and an attorney’s fee were also awarded. Plaintiff filed two motions seeking additional benefits under § 59-10-25, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 9, pt. 1, Supp. 1967). His first motion asked for a hearing on the question of whether additional benefits should be awarded. The trial court granted this hearing, but subject to terms. His second motion asked the trial court to award additional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lucero v. Los Alamos Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Segura v. Jack Adams General ContractorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Norvell v. Barnsdall Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Bartlett v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Lucero v. KoontzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by15 opinions
- Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sedillo v. Levi-Strauss Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jaramillo v. Kaufman Plumbing & Heating Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Amos v. Gilbert Western Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.