Legal Opinion · Dissent

Krohn v. Sweetheart Properties, Ltd.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2002No. CV-01-0246-CQPublished

1Dissent

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 39 I respectfully dissent. I am not certain whether the procedure the majority approves today represents wise public policy; it may well. I am certain that today’s opinion places this court in the position of adding to, not interpreting, a statutory procedure. That process should be left to the legislature.

¶ 40 The defects in the majority’s approach stem from its insistence upon treating the court’s authority over trustee’s sales, which are non-judicial foreclosures, in the same manner as we treat our authority over judicial foreclosures. Our authority to set…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Savers Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Horst R. Reetz and Kathleen K. ReetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Allied Steel Corp. v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Burge v. Fidelity Bond and Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMAArizona Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API