Legal Opinion
Freyne v. Xerox Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff instituted this action against Xerox and the individual defendants alleging several causes of action, including fraud and civil conspiracy. Both the corporate and the individual defendants moved at Special Term against the complaint under CPLR 3016 (subd [b]) and 3211 (subd [a], pars 2, 7, 8). They appeal from Special Term’s denial of their motion. Special Term erred in denying the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. A review of the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles v. Onondaga Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Citicorp Retail Services Inc. v. Wellington Mercantile Services Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Danahy v. MeeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Di Nardo v. L & W Industrial Park of Buffalo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cumberland Oil Corporation and Sugargrove, Ltd. v. James Thropp, Gregory Thropp, Arrowhead Gas Producers, Inc., and Southern Tier, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Aero Voyagers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- American-European Art Associates, Inc. v. Trend Galleries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Chase v. Columbia National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Raymond Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.