Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Kinney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lenawee. (Loveridge, J., presiding.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Defendants Kinney appeal. Bill dismissed as to defendant Lucinda ' M. Kinney, with costs, and decree affirmed as to defendant Amos A. Kinney, but no writ of assistance to be awarded to put him out of possession of the mortgaged premises, which he claims by a paramount title. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChampuin, C. J.

The bill in this case was filed to foreclose a mortgage executed by Francis H. Strong and Georgia A. Strong, his wife, to Israel Hall on November 10, 1866, to secure to the said Israel Hall the payment of the sum of SI,500 mentioned in a promissory note, of even date with the mortgage, with annual interest thereon.1 This mortgage was duly acknowledged, and recorded in the office of the register of deeds for the county of Lenawee on November 16, 1866, and purported to sell and convey unto Israel Hall, as the party of the second part, the S. W ¿-of the S. E. ¿ of section 21, township 8 S.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKisson v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roach v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McCamman v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bunch v. High Springs BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Millard v. HaywardMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Shedd v. KrushinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API