Legal Opinion

Second Nat'l Bank v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8243PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, C.

This suit is upon a promissory note, dated April 12th, 1877, executed! by Samuel Hill, John Hair and William Mote for $300, payable four months after date, to the order of the appellant, at its bank in Lafayette, with five per cent, attorney fees and with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum after maturity, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws. The suit was commenced in the Tippecanoe Circuit Court, and taken by change of venue to the Carroll Circuit Court.

The defendant Hill answered the complaint in three paragraphs. Though the record says that the answer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Philbrooks v. McEwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Voss v. German American BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Glazier v. DouglassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  5. Martin v. Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Citizens National Bank v. Mid-States Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. King v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API