Legal Opinion

Wilbon v. Plovanich

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 9, 2014No. 12 CV 1132PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge:

In their amended complaint, Plaintiffs set forth eight claims against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: 1) false arrest, 2) unconstitutional search of Plaintiffs’ persons, 3) unconstitutional search and seizure of a vehicle and its contents, 4) failure to intervene, 5) supervisory liability, 6) conspiracy, 7) malicious prosecution, and 8) indemnification. (Am. Compl. at 5-23.) Presently before us are cross-motions for summary judgment. (Defs.’ Mem., Pis.’ Mem.) Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment on counts I, II, IV,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. SanchezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Cooper v. The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Jackson v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Johnson v. Kurut, Star No. 6064District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Lietzow v. Village of HuntleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API