Wilbon v. Plovanich
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge:
In their amended complaint, Plaintiffs set forth eight claims against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: 1) false arrest, 2) unconstitutional search of Plaintiffs’ persons, 3) unconstitutional search and seizure of a vehicle and its contents, 4) failure to intervene, 5) supervisory liability, 6) conspiracy, 7) malicious prosecution, and 8) indemnification. (Am. Compl. at 5-23.) Presently before us are cross-motions for summary judgment. (Defs.’ Mem., Pis.’ Mem.) Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment on counts I, II, IV,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. SanchezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Cooper v. The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jackson v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Johnson v. Kurut, Star No. 6064District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Lietzow v. Village of HuntleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.