Legal Opinion

People v. Mayberry

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1982No. Crim. 22038PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

J. — (la) May law enforcement officers use police-trained dogs to detect the odor of narcotics emanating from transported containers in the baggage areas of public airports? Under the circumstances herein presented we conclude that they may and that the limited and nonintrusive olfactory investigation performed in this case did not constitute a “search” thereby invoking the constitutional limitations imposed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution or article I, section 13, of the California Constitution. Accordingly, we will affirm defendant’s judgment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Diane Doe, Etc. v. Omer Renfrow, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Lake County Mental Health Department v. Susan T.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. State v. TackittMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API