Ransom v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Arra Ransom appeals her convictions, after a jury trial, of confinement, as a class B felony, and battery, as a class C felony.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
ISSUES
1. Whether sufficient evidence supports the convictions.
2. Whether the trial court erred when it denied Ransom's motion for a new trial, which asserted that the State failed to disclose evidence favorable to the defense.
Whether her convictions for confinement and battery violate the double jeopardy provision of the Indiana Constitution.
FACTS
In December of 2008, Michael…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Garland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Bruno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cornelius Hines v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anthony C. Martin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Daniel L. Riddle v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hardley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.