Legal Opinion

Garland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2003No. 75S00-0011-CR-713PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b) is customarily used by criminal defendants to seek exclusion of evidence about their own prior bad acts. Appellant Sharon Garland presents a question of first impression: does Rule 404(b) apply to evidence about persons other than the defendant? We conclude that it does.

Facts and Procedural History

On the evening of January 24, 1996, David Garland was shot four or five times in the head. The events leading up to his murder, however, began more than two years earlier.

In October 1994, the Knox City Court ordered Sharon and David's son Allen to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. GarfoleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Rossetti v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Clemons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Camm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bryant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Bassett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API