Legal Opinion

Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1934No. 370Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

290 U.S. 398 (1934)

HOME BUILDING & LOAN ASSOCIATION

v.

BLAISDELL ET AL.

No. 370.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 8, 9, 1933

Decided January 8, 1934

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.

Messrs. Alfred W. Bowen and Karl H. Covell for appellant.

Mr. Harry H. Peterson, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Mr. William S. Ervin, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Mr. George T. Simpson was on the brief, for appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · HughesChief Justice Hughes

Appellant contests the validity of Chapter 339 of the Laws of Minnesota of 1933, p. 514, approved April 18, 1933, called the Minnesota Mortgage Moratorium Law, as being…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited148 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API