Legal Opinion
Begley v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Begley)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 11, 1984No. Bankruptcy No. 82-02461K, Adv. No. 82-3102K, Civ. A. No. 83-4657PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) has promulgated regulations which impose certain procedures upon utilities that seek to terminate service to a delinquent residential customer. 52 Pa.Admin.Code chap. 56 (Shepard’s 1983). These regulations require, among other things, that the utility give notice to the customer, personally contact the customer, and engage in negotiations under the PUC’s auspices to establish an amortized payment plan. An amortized payment plan provides that the customer will pay future bills when due and gradually…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Henry v. HeyisonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Watts v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Co. (In Re Watts)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Saunders v. Reeher (In Re Saunders)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hendrickson v. Philadelphia Gas WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Begley v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Begley)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Begley v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.