Legal Opinion

United States v. De Quilfeldt

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 3, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Hammond, D. J.

Tho defendant, being arraigned upon an information charging her with counterfeiting coins, pleaded not guilty, and was put upon her trial. She is described in the information simply as “Annie De Quilfeldt, otherwise known as Annie Egbert; ” all addition, such as “wife of A. B.,” “widow, ” or “spinster,” being omitted. On the trial, a witness, the detective who arrested her, was asked whether she was not living with Charles G. De Quilfeldt, who had just been convicted of counterfeiting, as his wife; whether they, at the time of arrest, called and recognized each other as such,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. City of Louisville v. ZanoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  3. United States v. WalshU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1878
  4. United States v. ShultsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FawcettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. AnthonyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Haning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. SwierzbenskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. Zankl, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API