United States v. Swierzbenski
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
There is no doubt that, under the English common .law and the common law of various of the states, where husband and wife are jointly prosecuted for a misdemeanor, the husband acquitted at the trial, and the wife convicted, the latter is entitled to have the conviction set aside on the theory that she aeted under coercion, threat, or command of her husband. The adjudications to which my attention is drawn, relating to the guilt of the husband, and not the wife, in violation of liquor laws, where it was proved that the offense was jointly committed, arose, in the main,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. TerryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas RR. Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- United States v. AnthonyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Haning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Commonwealth v. Zankl, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1970
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas RR. Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.