Legal Opinion

State v. Cordova

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 15, 2000No. 2 CA-CR 99-0211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Joseph Cordova was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, both dangerous nature offenses. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that he used a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, the state’s failure to disclose information about an anonymous tip, and the court’s jury instructions on lesser-included offenses. We affirm because a pellet gun can be a deadly weapon, no material evidence was undisclosed, and the jury instructions adequately reflected the law.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LeBlancArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HattonArizona Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HardySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State v. CarrilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. HardySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API