Armstrong v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The appeal is from a decree granting a divorce from appellant on the ground of becoming addicted after marriage to habitual drunkenness. Section 7407, Code of 1923, subd. 6.
The evidence was not taken orally before the court, but appears to have been taken before the register, and none of the witnesses seen and heard by the trial court. The review here, therefore, of the conclusion of the chancellor on the facts, is, in effect, under our statute, practically de novo. Section 10276, Code 1923; Wade v. Miller, 208 Ala. 264, 93 So. 905.
The bill also contained, as ground for divorce, a charge of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMahon v. McMahonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Moor v. MoorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Wade v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- O'Byrne v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meares v. MearesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Mink v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Adams v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Carnegie v. CarnegieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Murphree v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.