Wade v. Miller

It is needless for us to pass upon the propriety of the action of the trial court in not excluding- certain evidence introduced by the complainant, for, with such evidence excluded, the remaining evidence convinces us that, notwithstanding respondent’s possession of the notes, they were not paid, that is, the balance claimed, to be due either to complainant or Hill; and the conclusion of the trial court is‘affirmed. .Paragraph 1 of section 5955 of the Code of 1907 provides that in deciding appeals from the chancery court no weight shall be given the decision of the chancellor upon the facts,…