Legal Opinion

State v. Wamsley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2008No. 2006-2135PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

*389I. Introduction

{¶ 1} Today this court must determine whether a trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the culpable mental state of a charged offense is a “structural error” requiring automatic reversal or a “trial error” amenable to plain-error analysis when the defendant fails to object at trial. Because we hold that the error was not structural and the court of appeals failed to properly conduct a plain-error analysis, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to that court for further proceedings.

II. Facts

{¶ 2} Timothy M. Wamsley, defendant-appellee, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. SteeleOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. VirostekOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. Vance, 2007-Coa-035 (9-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. RizerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API