United States v. Cade
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WOLFE, Judge
We address two issues in this appeal. First, we address appellant’s assigned error that his counsel was ineffective at trial. Second, although not raised by appellant, we briefly address whether the offenses of rape and assault with intent to commit rape are multiplicious.
A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of rape, one specification of assault consummated by battery, and one specification of assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Articles 120, 128, and 134, Uniform…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Captain ADAM J. MYERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. Captain BRADY B. SIMPKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. Private E1 ADEN J. SCHRADERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Private E1 DALTON C. CZAICZYNSKIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. Private E1 PIERRE C. T. SCOTTArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.