Legal Opinion
United States v. Sue Ellen Staten
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2006No. 05-30055PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
United States v. Booker held that although district courts are no longer required to follow the United States Sentencing 6214 Guidelines (“Guidelines”), when making sentencing decisions, “the [Sentencing Reform] Act nonetheless requires judges to take account of the Guidelines together with other sentencing goals.” 543 U.S. 220, 259, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (citing 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (Supp.2004)); see also United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1278 (9th Cir.2006) (“[Notwithstanding that the Guidelines are now effectively advisory, ... district…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. StatenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Dennis Evan InghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Timothy James Lyons, United States of America v. Gabriel SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HerulaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.