Homesite Insurance Company, et al. v. Norcold, Inc., et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY, et. Case No. 2:21-cv-02167-RFB-DJA al., 8 ORDER Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 NORCOLD, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 175, 178, 182). For 15 the following reasons: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative for 16 an Order Treating Specified Facts as Established (ECF No. 178) is denied; Defendants’ Motion 17 for Partial Summary Judgment is granted (ECF No. 182); and Defendant CWI, Inc.’s Motion for 18 Summary…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.