Legal Opinion

Conard v. Dillingham

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1922No. Civil No. 1867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an action for damages which appellee, C. D. Dillingham, claims to have sustained as a result of certain slanderous statements alleged to have been made concerning him by the appellant, W. E. Conard. From a judgment for the former in the sum of $1,300 entered upon the verdict of a jury, and an order denying the latter’s motion for new trial, he appeals.

The cause of action is succinctly stated in the following complaint:

“That on5or about the twenty-fifth day of June, 1919, in the county of Maricopa, state of Arizona, in the presence of divers persons, the defendant did willfully,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Byam v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. GelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Callahan v. IngramSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Mattice v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Collins v. DilcherArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Horn v. RuessArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. GOLDWATER v. PHOENIXArizona Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API