Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re W.A.F.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1990No. 88-986Published

1ConcurrenceFarrell, Associate Judge

Although the issue is not free from doubt, I agree with the court that the standard of competency set forth in Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960), applies in juvenile delinquency proceedings. The issue is not without doubt because the Supreme Court has implied that the effect upon liberty of conviction as an adult may be different from the effect of a delinquency adjudication, inasmuch as “juveniles, unlike adults, are always in some form of custody....” Scholl v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 265, 104 S.Ct. 2403, 2410, 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984). Nevertheless, our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. District of Columbia v. M. A. C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. In re B. L. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API