Legal Opinion

Williams v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Connor, J., at tbe Fall Term, 1922, of CUMBERLAND. Civil action to recover on an insurance' policy on an automobile, covering risk of destruction by fire and lightning. At tbe close of tbe testimony, and on motion made in apt time, there was judgment of nonsuit, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoice, J.

Tbe facts in evidence tended to show that on 24 April, 1920, plaintiff bad an open dealer’s policy of insurance on automobiles held by him for sale, covering risks of loss by fire and lightning to an amount not to exceed $5,000, and at said date, covering tbe machine in question here and its value. That on 9 May, 1920, said machine was stolen from plaintiff’s garage in Fayetteville, N. C., and on 23 June, forty-six days thereafter, tbe charred remains of tbe automobile were found near Greenville, S. C., possession of same never having been recovered by plaintiff, tbe true owner.

From a perusal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Southern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Lummus v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greene v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Koury v. Providence-Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  3. Osmond Barringer Co. v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API