Legal Opinion

Application of Donald Richman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-3, 11, and 12 of appellant’s reissue application serial No. 299,141, filed July 26, 1963, 1 for reissue of his patent No. 2,933,558, granted April 19, 1960, on an application filed December 23, 1957, 2 for “Noise-Immune Synchronizing-Signal Separator for Television Receivers.”

Three issues are raised. One is whether the appealed application is defective for lack of a reissue oath complying with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 251. A second issue pertains to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re KellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. In re AltenpohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971
  4. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. Hazeltine Research, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-Appellant. Hazeltine Research, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API