State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1 — A jury convicted Jamaal Johnson of second degree robbery. The trial court suppressed victim Abraham Castillo’s identification of Johnson, ruling it was based on an impermissibly suggestive showup. Johnson argues that the court erred by allowing Castillo to identify a black jacket with patches as the jacket worn by one of the three robbers. We hold the trial court properly allowed Castillo’s in-court identification of the jacket under the independent source doctrine. Identification of physical evidence, including clothing, is not subject to the same due process safeguards as is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. Howard Jones(073827)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State Of Washington v. Andre WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014