Legal Opinion

Pilkington v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1901No. Congressional, 8669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The Reporters' statement of the case : The following are the facts of this case as found, by the court: That the amount heretofore allowed the claimant under a prior reference to the court of said claim, to wit, the sum of $2,860, which was allowed June 4, 1889, was thereafter, on March 3,1891, appropriated for by Congress (26 St'at.-L., 1441, 1453), which sum was thereafter taken and accepted by him and receipted for “ as a full and final discharge ” of said claims so…

Read the full summary

The Reporters' statement of the case : The following are the facts of this case as found, by the court: That the amount heretofore allowed the claimant under a prior reference to the court of said claim, to wit, the sum of $2,860, which was allowed June 4, 1889, was thereafter, on March 3,1891, appropriated for by Congress (26 St'at.-L., 1441, 1453), which sum was thereafter taken and accepted by him and receipted for “ as a full and final discharge ” of said claims so examined, investigated, and reported favorably by the Court of Claims.,

1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.

The question presented in this case is (1) whether a committee of Congress, under the act of March 3, 1883 (22 Stat. *358L., 485), known as the Bowman Act, can transmit to the court a second time a claim or matter after the same has once been judicially investigated, the facts found and reported to Congress, and the amount allowed by the court appropriated for “as a full and final discharge” and paid; and (2) if that can be done, whether, under such - circumstances, the claim is discharged and forever barred under that appropriation and under Revised Statutes, sections 1092 and. 1093.

The act of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
  2. Burwell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1887
  3. Dowdy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1888
  4. Michot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  2. Ruf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API