Russell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the claimant’s Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts upon which this motion was determined are fully-set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
DRAKE, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a motion, filed June 30,1879, “ to correct an error appearing on the face of the record,” in a judgment rendered in favor of the claimant on the 6th of December, 1869, for the sum of $41,355.33, which it is claimed should have been for $41,855.33, or for $500 more than it was entered for.
The claimant refers to the opinion of the court in the case, as published in 5 C. Cls. R., 121, where the court stated the calculation on which its judgment was based, and where it is quite apparent that there was an arithmetical error in stating “32…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Ex Parte: In the Matter of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
- Michot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1896
- Pilkington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
- Ruf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.