Legal Opinion
Goldstone-Tobias Agency, Inc. v. Barbroo Enterprises Productions, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1965No. Civ. 28617PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
Respondent, (plaintiff) is a theatrical agency. Pursuant to written contracts of agency it solicits and exerts itself to obtain employment in various facets of the entertainment industry for its clients. Appellant (defendant) is a similar agency and at the time of this action and for some time prior thereto, represented Mickey Rooney, an actor.
On August 19, 1960, respondent had entered into an agency contract with Rooney to represent Rooney for one year for which representation respondent was to receive 10 per cent of Rooney’s gross income in the entertainment industry. The agency contract…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Young v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hamilton v. Oakland School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bennett v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Queen of Angels Hospital v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Murphy v. T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Murphy v. T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Morris Company v. Boman CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.