Legal Opinion
United States v. Ruben R. De La Rosa, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 29, 1999No. 98-2045PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Ruben De La Rosa (“De La Rosa”) filed a pretrial “Motion to Bar Government From Introducing at Trial Substance of Defendant’s Post-Arrest Statement Due to a Governmental Violation of FRCrP Rule 16” and argued that the government belatedly disclosed his post-arrest statement in violation of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial judge denied the motion. After a jury found that De La Rosa was guilty of conspiring to possess cocaine and possession of cocaine, De La Rosa filed a motion for a new trial. The district court granted the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. PraterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ramon NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Otha Dennis and James Brown, A/K/A Donald Ray WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert SalernoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Jessica Maldonado v. U.S. Bank and Manufacturers BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Walter Breland, Katrel Thomas, and Andre VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Raul Cruz-Velasco, Ramiro S. Trevino, and Joseph L. CuevasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Tony L. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- United States v. LaurentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.