Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Junkin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 29, 1934No. 11476PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

This suit was instituted in a district court of Dallas county by E. D. Junkin and T. P. Junkin against C. J. Lloyd, C. L. Lloyd, and the Nu-Enamel Paint Company a corporation, to recover damages for deceit and misrepresentations of fact, which induced the plaintiff, E. D. Junkin, to make a contract with the defendant Nu-Enamel Paint Company, to act for it as a distributing agent and put on a campaign in the eastern part of the state of Oklahoma to establish the Nu-Enamel products, causing him, to his detriment, to invest money, time, and labor in attempting to carry out his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ShufordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Barrett v. FeatherstoneTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wortman v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Jackson v. StockbridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Landrum v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  2. Zucht v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. James and Betty Zar v. Omni Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Maness v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API