People v. A.C. (In re A.C.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, P. J.
*264A.C., a ward of the juvenile court, made statements to an in-home counselor who interpreted them as threats. The juvenile court sustained a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition and found that A.C. violated his conditions of probation by making criminal threats. ( Pen. Code, § 422, subd. (a).)1 A.C. appeals.
We conclude that statements A.C. made to a counselor are admissible because they do not fall within the psychotherapist-patient privilege. ( Evid. Code, § 1014.) We also conclude A.C.'s statements do not violate his conditions of probation. We reverse.
FACTS
After sustaining a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. FelixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ChoiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021