Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzales

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2013No. S191240PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether the trial court properly applied the psychotherapist-patient privilege with regard to statements made by a parolee to his therapist during parole-mandated therapy sessions and, if not, whether the trial court’s error constitutes a violation of a federal constitutional right of privacy as well as a violation of the state statutory privilege.

In January 2007, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a petition seeking to commit defendant Ramiro Gonzales as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. Carlos J. (In re Carlos J.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. EbertowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API